America, your
borders are coming down!
(For immediate release)
Thursday November 23, 2006
From the desk of “V”;
Huge amounts of Texas, Oklahoma and Kansas, are about to be
claimed and stolen under “Imminent Domain”, and then the NAFTA
Superhighway, built to accommodate the import of foreign goods into
this country, complete with a Mexican Port-of-entry in Kansas, that is
designated Mexican soil? Largest land grab ever devised in the U.S. So
much for your property rights.
“At their meeting in Waco, Texas, at the end of March
2005, U.S. President George W. Bush, Mexican President Vicente Fox, and
Canadian Prime Minister Paul Martin committed their governments to a path of
cooperation and joint action.”
I am quoting from this
document.
I thought it was illegal for the president of the
United States to enter into a treaty with a foreign government without the
approval of congress. Without oversight, or even announcing this to the press,
plans are underway to move your borders to the neighboring countries of Mexico,
and Canada. I feel safer already.
This partnership will sacrifice U.S.
sovereignty by establishing a “North American Union,” with open borders and a
common currency. The term “AMERO” is being
tossed around.
This is all being done in secret.
For instance: (From the NASCO website…)
“Is NASCO a part of a secret conspiracy?
Absolutely not. Our
organization has been in existence for 12 years. We are not tied to any
Presidential Administration. We welcome the opportunity to share information
about our organization.
Will the NAFTA Superhighway be four
football fields wide?
There is no new, proposed
“NAFTA Superhighway.”
(REALLY, Then what
the hell is this?
TEXAS
DOT)
And if it doesn’t exist, why do they need this?
Here’s the Smart
port site.
And this: “Coordinate
the Mexican Customs Inspection facility project”, didn’t just originate from my imagination,
it originated
here.
In actuality, after
ten years, NAFTA has turned into a huge failure, and should be re-thought.
Would you like to know where all of the illegals come from?
View this link
MEXICO
AGRICULTURE, RURAL CRISIS
“At NAFTA’s start date, nearly one quarter of Mexico’s
active labor force was involved in the agricultural sector — about 8 million people.
Under NAFTA this number fell to approximately 6.5 million by 2003.”
INVESTMENT, EXPORTS HAVE NOT
BENEFITED THE BROADER
ECONOMY
“The vast majority of Mexican workers have not
benefited from NAFTA. Instead, the minimum wage, which approximately 25% of the
country’s 40 million workers earn, has declined 20% and hovers at around
$4/day. Half of the workforce makes less than $8/day.12 The huge
influx of migrants from the collapsing rural economy and weak economic growth
under NAFTA has helped keep wages stubbornly low, and failing to keep up with
inflation, let alone productivity gains. Attempts by Mexican workers to
unionize have been harshly — often violently — countered.”
“Now, ten years later, it is clear that NAFTA-related
business activity has increased air and water pollution and generated tons of
hazardous waste which is being dumped. Instead of industrial development
becoming more dispersed throughout the country, it intensified along the
border, inflicting still more environmental degradation on already heavily
polluted areas. During the NAFTA era, the number of maquiladora factories
nationwide more than doubled from 1700 plants in 1990 to 3600 in 2001 — with
2700 plants located along the border by 2001.According to Mexican government
figures, the cost of NAFTA-related
Environmental damage was an estimated $47 billion — in
1999 alone.20 Meanwhile, the institutions that were set up to
facilitate and fund environmental cleanup and protection programs have proven
themselves to be wholly inadequate.”
World Bank
Wrong Numbers:
“It turns out that the study’s most touted finding – that
NAFTA had a positive effect on per capita Mexico's growth was based on the
World Bank using the wrong data. We mean really wrong. For instance,
the numbers used as US GDP was simply wrong, with a number used that is more
comparable to Portugal’s GDP, not the US’.”
National Latino Leaders
Urge Congress to Rethink NAFTA-style Trade and Economic Policies:
"Now therefore be it resolved that our
organizations call on the U.S. Congress and the Bush administration to
immediately cease their anti-immigrant, failed trade policies that are
continuing to force families to migrate from their homes in the first place;
develop trade policies that promote the creation of sustainable development and
good jobs in the United States and abroad by replacing the Fast Track process
and replacing the failed NAFTA-CAFTA trade agreement model that has proved
damaging to the livelihoods of the majority and the environment in involved
countries while creating economic and social devastation that promotes
dangerous, desperate cross-border migration."
America, how much
encouragement to help yourselves, do you need? It was actually NAFTA itself
that caused the influx of illegals. They are starving, and were forced to move.
Meanwhile the rich get richer at the expense of all of
us, and President Bush is purchasing
98,000 acres of land in Paraguay for his retirement from office. Why did
you think the Bush
girls are in South America? It sort of reeks as the “Boys from Brazil”
doesn’t it?
It sits on the
world’s largest fresh water aquifer. Can’t drink oil!
Wake up, America. You’re being sold down the river again.
“V”